Copy, content strategy, and messaging that moves people from curious to converted.
Just nobody called it that at the time.
One product. One voice. Every channel it would actually need.
All five pieces. One brief. One brand.
Four decisions that shaped every piece.
My first instinct was to describe what Syncly does. "AI-powered meeting notes." I wrote a full homepage before realising the problem: I was writing about a feature, not a feeling.
When I stopped and asked what actually frustrates people about meetings, the answer wasn't that notes are hard to take. It was that nothing from the meeting seems to stick. Decisions get forgotten. Tasks get dropped. The meeting happened and nothing changed.
Then I pushed it one step further. Even if the notes are perfect , does anyone go back and read them? That question is what the whole project ended up being about.
Before I touched a single channel, I wrote down four things I wanted anyone reading Syncly's content to come away with. Not taglines. Just honest positions on the problem.
I wrote everything myself. Once a draft existed, I'd ask AI to look for what wasn't working. Not "make this better" , more like "what would make someone stop reading here?"
Three questions I kept coming back to:
If Syncly were live, these are the questions I'd be asking.
I want a content role where the questions on this page are part of the job. I write clearly, I move fast, and I care about whether it actually works.
If you're hiring for content and want someone who's already thinking about your funnel , let's talk.
Say hello →